=> Bootstrap dependency digest>=20010302: found digest-20190127 WARNING: [license.mk] Every package should define a LICENSE. => Checksum SHA1 OK for waste-source.tar.gz => Checksum RMD160 OK for waste-source.tar.gz => Checksum SHA512 OK for waste-source.tar.gz ===> Installing dependencies for waste-1.0 => Tool dependency nbpatch-[0-9]*: found nbpatch-20151107 => Tool dependency checkperms>=1.1: found checkperms-1.12 => Build dependency cwrappers>=20150314: found cwrappers-20180325 ===> Skipping vulnerability checks. WARNING: No /opt/pkg/pkgdb/pkg-vulnerabilities file found. WARNING: To fix run: `/opt/pkg/sbin/pkg_admin -K /opt/pkg/pkgdb fetch-pkg-vulnerabilities'. ===> Overriding tools for waste-1.0 ===> Extracting for waste-1.0 ===> Patching for waste-1.0 => Applying pkgsrc patches for waste-1.0 => Verifying /opt/pkgsrc/net/waste/patches/patch-aa => Applying pkgsrc patch /opt/pkgsrc/net/waste/patches/patch-aa Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-aa,v 1.4 2006/01/08 21:42:42 joerg Exp $ | |--- /dev/null 2003-05-31 11:34:06.000000000 -0400 |+++ Makefile 2003-05-31 11:52:33.000000000 -0400 -------------------------- (Creating file Makefile...) Patching file Makefile using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done => Verifying /opt/pkgsrc/net/waste/patches/patch-ab => Applying pkgsrc patch /opt/pkgsrc/net/waste/patches/patch-ab Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-ab,v 1.2 2006/01/08 21:42:42 joerg Exp $ | |--- xfers.cpp.orig 2003-05-31 11:54:02.000000000 -0400 |+++ xfers.cpp 2003-05-31 11:54:27.000000000 -0400 -------------------------- Patching file xfers.cpp using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 30. done => Verifying /opt/pkgsrc/net/waste/patches/patch-ac => Applying pkgsrc patch /opt/pkgsrc/net/waste/patches/patch-ac Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-ac,v 1.1.1.1 2003/06/05 01:00:45 jschauma Exp $ | |--- srvmain.cpp.orig 2003-05-31 11:55:08.000000000 -0400 |+++ srvmain.cpp 2003-05-31 11:55:47.000000000 -0400 -------------------------- Patching file srvmain.cpp using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 28. done => Verifying /opt/pkgsrc/net/waste/patches/patch-ad => Applying pkgsrc patch /opt/pkgsrc/net/waste/patches/patch-ad Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-ad,v 1.1.1.1 2003/06/05 01:00:46 jschauma Exp $ | |--- rsa/nn.h.orig 2003-05-31 12:16:15.000000000 -0400 |+++ rsa/nn.h 2003-05-31 12:16:25.000000000 -0400 -------------------------- Patching file rsa/nn.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done => Verifying /opt/pkgsrc/net/waste/patches/patch-ae => Applying pkgsrc patch /opt/pkgsrc/net/waste/patches/patch-ae Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-ae,v 1.1.1.1 2003/06/05 01:00:47 jschauma Exp $ | |This document created from "waste design.doc" using antiword | |--- /dev/null 2003-05-31 12:24:31.000000000 -0400 |+++ README 2003-05-31 12:24:37.000000000 -0400 -------------------------- (Creating file README...) Patching file README using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done => Verifying /opt/pkgsrc/net/waste/patches/patch-af => Applying pkgsrc patch /opt/pkgsrc/net/waste/patches/patch-af Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-af,v 1.1 2006/01/25 16:11:49 joerg Exp $ | |--- platform.h.orig 2006-01-08 21:31:20.000000000 +0000 |+++ platform.h -------------------------- Patching file platform.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 83. done ===> Creating toolchain wrappers for waste-1.0 ===> Configuring for waste-1.0 => Checking for portability problems in extracted files